|
| OFFICIAL NEWS SNIPET GLOBAL WARMING STATEMENT |
| Monday, May 14, 2007 |

I discuss global warming on a lot of blogs. Global warming is a primary concern to many people. It seems to have trumped world poverty and disease, and the discussion of our freedoms, and seems to be second only to the war in Iraq. The following post is my official position on climate change. I am posting it for friends or fellow bloggers for purpose of referral.
Jack's Official Global Warming...Climate Change Position
1. I believe there may be global warming. Of course, the jury is still out on that one, but I don't particularly discount it.
2. I believe that science is too young to factually establish that global warming is anthropogenic. I am not saying that it isn't anthropogenic, just that it has not been established.
3. I believe that we have a generation of scientist who are untrustworthy in their presentation of data. While science doesn't lie, scientist are subject to the shortcomings of any human and have and do.
4. I believe that even if it is established that there is global warming and that it is anthropogenic, that it would hardly be possible to predict that it will be a crisis of monumental proportions that will bring about the extinction of our planet and its lifeforms.
5. I believe that the contemporary issue is driven more by politics and ideology than science, and it has tainted any evidence we have one way or the other beyond its usability. If the debate became strictly scientific we may arrive at a conclusive position, but until that happens we never will.
Expansion on points above:
1. Global warming AND cooling is supported scientifically. It has happened since the planet has been here. Apparently it is a natural cycle that existed eons before man even walked the planet, and quite possibly will happen long after we're gone.
2. As long as there are two opposing "scientific views" with supportable scientific data, it is not an established fact that we are going to face catastrophe from anthropogenic global warming. Neither side has an established case, nor can it. The jury is still out--if you have made up your mind already you are either:
- Ignorant,
- Gullible, or
- An ideological nut case.
(And I say this will all due respect!)
3. Keep in mind that it has been scientists (not science) that has told us that:  the world was flat,
that a nuclear bomb detonation would destroy the whole world,
that leaching blood would cure disease,
that the earth's population today would be 10 times greater than it is,
that the universe revolves around the earth,
that the Titanic was unsinkable,
that continents do not shift, etc.
It is also scientist who have lived off the accumulation of unbelievable sums of money in the name of science. SETI comes to mind--an amazingly expensive mechanism and project listening for the mother ship--aliens! I'm amazed they didn't hear the ET's that came and took away all those poor souls from the Heaven's Gate cult. It would be foolish to believe that the countless monies being spent on global warming research does insert a degree of bias into the "scientific" equation.
Scientific error, says Robert Park, "has a way of evolving ... from self-delusion to fraud. I use the term voodoo science to cover them all: pathological science, junk science, pseudoscience, and fraudulent science." In pathological science, scientists fool themselves. Junk science refers to scientists who use their expertise to befuddle and mislead others (usually juries or lawmakers). Pseudoscience has the trappings of science without any evidence. Fraudulent science is, well, fraud--old-fashioned lying.
4. Man has been crying the destruction of the world from the street corner for as long as we have recorded history. "Repent, for the day is at hand." is a cry familiar to all of us. As human beings, we are fascinated with catastrophe and crises--it is what sells in our media, what fuels our weather channels, and what dominates our conversation on a daily basis. It is also our propensity to create fantastical scenarios where they are not, sometimes as a means of self-affirmation, sometimes to control the behavior of others, and sometimes simply for the thrill of the moment.
5. This is the crux of the matter. It doesn't matter what the evidence will say. The earth could be covered completely with ice from pole to pole from an ice age and it would not matter. Facts are immaterial to the political and religiously ideological mindset. With the intellectual and powerful--the issue is political, with the ignorant and simple-minded it is ideological. The rich and powerful will use this issue to leverage power and the all-too-willing sheep who follow them will be more than accommodating because of the emotional and spiritual affirmation they receive as a byproduct. While it may be scientists who may be swayed by money to present less than factual data, it is often the hangup of our leaders to exploit issues for their own profit or power. How many "crises" have we faced? Counting down from the most recent: 1. Recession 2. Oil depletion, 3. Energy, 4. Outsourcing, 5. WMD's, 6. Y2K, 7. Asteroid, 8. Ice age. The list is endless.
Also, keep in mind that as we progress, every time there is an climatic anomaly that doesn't support the global "warming" model, the term "climate change" will be used. For example, we have experienced record cool temperatures in the the South United States for this time of year. The reason is because of "climate change", which is "global warming" propagandized. (Sort of like in the '70s when pro-abortion became "pro-choice").
Conclusion:
The News Snipet has been and is about making predictions. The prediction is that governments world-wide will use this issue as a means of increasing taxation and regulation. They will use is as a means of taking freedoms and eliminating personal property. Many people will suffer as a result of draconian policies that are issued based on faulty data. Problems like world poverty and disease will be placed on the back burner for a pipe dream.
Collateral damage in the WAR ON CLIMATE CHANGE.
Visit here for your Global Warming Fix.
Labels: anthropogenic global warming, global warming, man-made global warming |
posted by Jack Mercer @ 5/14/2007 03:23:00 PM   |
|
|
|
| THE CONTEMPORARY CHURCH OF WESTERN WHITE LIBERALISM |
| Thursday, April 26, 2007 |
Recently a friend, Doug, got fed up and let loose on an issue. He was tired of mincing words and being diplomatic, and just wanted to tell it like it is.
The News Snipet is going to do the same.
Not long ago, the News Snipet pointed out that white western liberals throughout the world are faced with a new dilemma. One of their pet issues, global warming, was going to clash with another of their pet issues, poverty.
Visit here for the full article
Contemporary white western liberalism is a religion, and behaves like any other religion--it is all about controlling others based on "religious" principles without consideration of the original message and its intent.
- In the name of tolerance, one becomes ultimately intolerant.
- Broad mindedness ultimately becomes narrow-minded.
- Non-discrimination becomes in discrimination which ultimately becomes discrimination.
One can only expect, that the results of this widespread and popular religion will yield the same fruit of any "theocracy."
The banners have been unfurled, and as "Onward Liberal Soldiers, marching as to war" swells from rank and file the machine grinds underfoot any opposition. Collateral damage is expected and acceptable, because the cause is self-affirmingly righteous.
This religious hysteria is beginning to harm people who are close to me, like Mr. Bobbie, not only that, but the effects are touching many world wide.
AOL News reports just one example:
"This week's story that no one read and everyone should have is about tortilla riots in Mexico. Yes, tortilla riots. In Mexico. Some 75,000 people protesting the rising price of tortillas.
Not to be overly blunt, but who cares, right? It's just a single grocery item in some other country. But the reason the people are up in arms is more important than anyone realizes.
Poor Mexicans rely on tortillas for their diet. And a lot of other poor people in a lot of other places rely on other foodstuffs made from corn.
The problem is ethanol. Ethanol, that fuel additive that reduces pollution and helps us wean our dependency on foreign oil and makes farmers rich and politicians look silly when they stump in Iowa. As the U.S. adds more ethanol to its gasoline, the price of corn is surging dramatically, leading to extreme market volatility."
While its religious leaders like Al Gore, a small, despicable and self-absorbed man who fancies himself the savior of the world, purchase "energy credits" (See HERE and HERE)and jet around the world preaching the gospel of "DO AS I SAY DO, NOT AS I DO", people are going to bed hungry at night.
While its religious groupies, like Sheryl Crowe who don't comprehend that much of the world can't even afford toilet paper, much less luxuriate in 1-3 sheets, engage in orgiastic consumption, old people are going to die from a lack of heating and cooling.
The blood of millions of innocents drips from the the hands of the world's religions and its warmongers, and this religion is no different.
- This coming winter, many poor people will experience cold like never before because of liberal "green" energy policy and its impact on utilities.
- This coming year, many poor people will go hungry as a result of misguided and moronic policies like the one mentioned above.
- This coming decade more people will be pushed lower down the economic scale as a result of skyrocketing energy prices, regulation and taxation.
All for actions based on "all available evidence" pointing to something that doesn't exist.
Western white liberals, you have lost your moral authority to judge the likes of President Bush and his war machine. Your policies will make he and his cronies look like amateurs. You have lost your moral authority to point at the military-industrial complex and its death and destruction. You have lost your moral authority because your hands are covered with the same filth you claim to loathe.
- Western white liberals used to think.
- Western white liberals used to care.
But what was once a faith, is now just another dominating religion.
To read stories of other religious people who forgot what it was all about and had become with the "collateral damage" of their belief systems go hereLabels: angry white liberals, contemporary liberals, global warming, man-made global warming, religion |
posted by Jack Mercer @ 4/26/2007 10:33:00 AM   |
|
|
|
| GET WITH IT, MR. BOBBIE |
| Wednesday, April 11, 2007 |
Mr. Bobbie is a friend of mine. He has cancer, incurable, for which he gets radiation. His wife, Glendale, has a brain tumor--undetermined at present whether its malignant or not.
Mr. Bobbie gets a social security check each month. His rent alone accounts for over half. Not long ago, we cleaned out a storage building on my property. Mr. Bobbie took most of what I had to sell at the Jockey Lot, something he tries to do just to keep living.
Mr. Bobbie drives a 1983 Chevy Caprice. Its not all tricked out like. Its pretty beat up, shabby--runs used tires on it.
Makes about 10-12 miles to a gallon...
I was watching a news debate type show called "Bulls and Bears" on one of the cable network news channels. There were three people debating, with one moderating. There was a pretty young blond woman, Laura who indicated that the recent rise in gasoline prices was a good thing because it battled global warming, that it would force auto makers to create more "hybrids" and also force consumers to buy more "hybrids."
Mr. Bobbie is having to borrow money from friends and family to get enough gasoline to get him to his cancer treatments and the jockey lot and back. Money that he pays back out of the meager sales he makes.
Its a good thing Mr. Bobbie has to pay high prices for gas, because he really needs to break down and buy himself one of those shiny new hybrids.
"Some wealthy elitists in our country who cannot tell fact from fiction, can afford an Olympian detachment from the impacts of draconian climate change policy. For them, the jobs and dreams destroyed as a result will be nothing more than statistics and the cares of other people. These consequences are abstractions to them. I can name many of the thousands of the American citizens whose lives will be destroyed by these elitists' ill-conceived ‘global goofiness' campaigns."Labels: global warming, man-made global warming |
posted by Jack Mercer @ 4/11/2007 12:29:00 PM   |
|
|
|
| SACRIFICES MUST BE MADE... |
| Monday, March 26, 2007 |
A NEW DILEMMA
Contemporary liberals once again find themselves faced with a moral dilemma of their own making. The latest religion, adopted hook, line and sinker, among urban white atheist liberals is the coming apocalypse, ala man-made global warming.
Something must be done and must be done NOW to appease the Carbon-neutral god!
A good start would be the complete adherence to the GW Koran, aka: the Kyoto Treaty, that their holy prophet, Al Gore, was instrumental in writing. (Through divine inspiration of course).
But...a choice must be made.
The problem is, the GW Koran (aka: the Kyoto Treaty) teaches great sacrifice, almost EXTREME sacrifice. Self-flagellation and denial of a most strict and sacred nature. So extreme that the direct costs may mount into the trillions of trillions of dollars, with indirect costs too numerous and complex to even quantify.
The GW Koran will bring to a jarring halt the growth and independence of developing and third world nations whose populations are stricken by poverty and the death, decay and disease that accompanies it.
But that's ok, the war on poverty and its consignment of millions to an early grave is much less appealing than the appeasement of a faceless and capricious god.
The sacrifice is worth it.
Dilemma solved. Labels: global warming, man-made global warming, religion |
posted by Jack Mercer @ 3/26/2007 03:01:00 PM   |
|
|
|
| THIS SUMS UP THE ENTIRE ISSUE |
| Wednesday, March 14, 2007 |
| IF THIS DOESN'T GIVE YOU THE TRUE PERSPECTIVE OF WHAT WE ARE BEING FED, NOTHING WILL:
James E. Hansen, an environmental scientist, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies and a top adviser to Mr. Gore, said, “Al does an exceptionally good job of seeing the forest for the trees,” adding that Mr. Gore often did so “better than scientists.” Labels: global warming, man-made global warming |
posted by Jack Mercer @ 3/14/2007 10:50:00 AM   |
|
|
|
| BEAR TODAY, GONE TOMORROW. |
| Thursday, March 08, 2007 |
| GONE TOMORROW
Study Says Polar Bears Could Face Extinction (washingtonpost.com): "The sea ice in Hudson Bay, Canada, now breaks up 2 1/2 weeks earlier than it did 30 years ago, said Canadian Wildlife Service research scientist Ian Stirling, and as a result female polar bears there weigh 55 pounds less than they did then. Assuming the current rate of ice shrinkage and accompanying weight loss in the Hudson Bay region, bears there could become so thin by 2012 they may no longer be able to reproduce, said Lara Hansen, chief scientist for the World Wildlife Fund.
'Once the population stops reproducing, that's pretty much the end of it,' Hansen said.
Arctic residents have already detected changes in polar bears' behavior. Jose Kusugak, president of the Canadian Inuit political association, said at a news conference that within the past two years he witnessed a polar bear 'stock up on caribou' because it was deprived of seals. Hudson Bay residents now complain the bears are coming onto land more often, forced to seek sustenance in a habitat where they are less well adapted. Polar bears are not the only Arctic animals in trouble. The ringed seals that bears eat, and that humans hunt, are also dependent on the sea ice to rest, give birth, nurse and feed. " WAIT, AREN'T YOU BEARS SUPPOSED TO BE GOING SOMEWHERE?! ESA LISTING NOT NEEDED FOR POLAR BEARS: Environmental activists have presented only one academic study that shows any negative effect of warming temperatures on polar bears, and only anecdotal evidence of bears drowning and eating each other, says H. Sterling Burnett, senior fellow at the National Center for Policy Analysis.
Other, more comprehensive research suggests the plight of that one population does not reflect the polar bear population trend as a whole:
Since the 1970s, while much of the world was warming, polar bear numbers increased dramatically, from roughly 5,000 to 25,000 bears -- a higher polar bear population than has existed at any time in the twentieth century.
Scientists believe polar bears thrived in the past in temperatures even warmer than at present -- during the medieval warm period 1,000 years ago and during the Holocene Climate Optimum between 5,000 and 9,000 years ago.
Dr. Mitchell Taylor, a biologist with Nunavut Territorial government in Canada says the polar bear population in Canada alone has increased 25 percent from 12,000 to 15,000 during the past decade, with 11 of Canada's 13 polar bear populations stable or increasing in number. Labels: global warming, man-made global warming |
posted by Jack Mercer @ 3/08/2007 03:14:00 PM   |
|
|
|
| WORD ASSOCIATION |
| Wednesday, February 21, 2007 |
Let's play word association. Read the following four descriptions and think of the first word that comes to mind:
Dogmatic faith-based system Preaches future damnation without salvific repentance
Attempts rigid control over adherents and non-adherents alike
Extorts money and resources based on fear
Did you think religion?
I recently tried to talk to a "man-made global warming" convert. It was like reasoning with a muslim with a bomb strapped to his waist. Labels: global warming, man-made global warming, religion |
posted by Jack Mercer @ 2/21/2007 02:47:00 PM   |
|
|
|
|
| About Me |
|

Name: Jack Mercer
Home:
About Me:
See my complete profile
"Snipet" (pronounced: snipe - it) is not a word.It is a derivative of two words: "Snipe" and "Snippet".
Miriam Webster defines Snipe as: to aim a carping or snide attack, or: to shoot at exposed individuals (as of an enemy's forces) from a usually concealed point of vantage.
Miriam Webster defines Snippet as: : a small part, piece, or thing; especially : a brief quotable passage.
In short, "Snipets" are brief, snide shots at exposed situations from a concealed vantage point.
WARNING! With due reverence to the Bill of Rights and the First Amendment there is NO comment policy on the News Snipet.
|
| Other things |
| Archives |
|
|
| Politics |
|
| Template by |

|
|